You are here
Genomic and Proteomic Analysis of Foodborne Pathogens
1. Conduct a functional and molecular characterization of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) with specific emphasis elucidating the responses to food-related stresses, and genomic and proteomic studies to assess changes in virulence and pathogenicity. 1A: Comparative phylogenomics and phenomics of non-O157 STEC. 1B: Examine and compare stress responses, including acid tolerance, in E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 STEC. 1C: Role of SdiA in acid tolerance of STEC O157:H7 and non-O157 STEC. 1D: Molecular serotyping of E. coli. 1E: Methods for detection and identification of non-O157 STEC.
2: Conduct functional and molecular characterization of Campylobacter species with specific emphasis on responses to intrinsic and extrinsic stresses through genomic and proteomic studies, and examination of morphological and physiological changes. 2A: Determine the â€œmode of actionâ€ by which polyphosphates (extrinsic stress) enhance the survival of C. jejuni and C. coli strains. 2B: Use genomic and/or proteomic studies to molecularly characterize Campylobacterâ€™s physiological response to food additives under poultry processing conditions. 2C: Determine if members of the microbial ecology of chicken exudates provide survival advantages/disadvantages to Campylobacter. 2D: Determine if common food additives change the composition of the microbial ecology of chicken exudate and if these changes are responsible for enhancing the survival of Campylobacter under food processing and storage conditions.
3: Conduct functional and molecular characterization of Listeria monocytogenes serotypes with specific emphasis on elucidating responses to food-related stresses through proteomics and genomics; and determining virulence differences among L. monocytogenes serotypes through sequencing and comparative genomics. 3A: Determine genes that are essential for the survival and growth of L. monocytogenes under weak organic acid conditions. 3B: Determine genetic responses of a pressure-resistant L. monocytogenes mutant exposed to the food preservative nisin. 3C: Determine genes responsible for the differences in virulence and stress responses among L. monocytogenes serotypes through sequencing, gene expression, and comparative genomics.
Gunther, Nereus (Jack)
J Food Sci. 2014 Aug 21. [Epub ahead of print]
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e105272.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Jun 18;4:81.
Anim Health Res Rev. 2014 Jun;15(1):63-75.
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 May;8:1-10.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Mar 3;173:99-104.
J Food Prot. 2014 Feb;77(2):180-8.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Jan;11(1):30-7.
J Food Sci. 2013 Sep;78(9):M1392-8.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 May;40(5):495-505.
Microbiol Res. 2013 Mar 30;168(3):174-82.
African J Biotechnol. 2013 Mar 13;12(11):1239-49.
Full text available in the NAL Digital Collections.
Can J Microbiol. 2013 Mar;59(3):141-52.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012 Dec 20;2:152.
J Food Prot. 2012 Dec;75(12):2241-50.
BMC Cell Biosci. 2012 Nov 27;2(1):39.
J Food Prot. 2012 Nov;75(11):1939-50.
J Food Prot. 2012 Sep;75(9):1548-54.
Fungal Biol. 2012 Aug;116(8):863-71.
Plasmid. 2012 Jul;68(1):25-32.
J Sep Sci. 2012 Jun;35(12):1399-405.
J Food Sci. 2012 May;77(5):M285-91.
J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2012;4:141-6.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48467.
J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2012;S2:003.
Evol Bioinform Online. 2012;8:79-87.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Dec 15;151(3):307-13.
Anim Health Res Rev. 2011 Dec;12(2):169-85.
Government Policy and Regulations